Big Tech Libertarians and the Pro-Natalism Meme

The recent rise of “Pro-Natalism” among Big Tech libertarians like Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Marc Andreessen represents a concerning trend. This astro-turfed movement, echoing Jeffrey Epstein’s vision of seeding humanity with “superior” DNA, raises alarms with its eugenic undertones. The movement’s prominent figures, Malcolm and Simone Collins, are deeply integrated into American power structures, further complicating the narrative.

The Roots of Pro-Natalism

The origins of Pro-Natalism can be traced back to influential families and historical connections to American imperialism and eugenics. Malcolm Collins, a key figure in the movement, comes from a notable Dallas family with deep financial and political ties. His grandfather, a banker and supplement salesman, played a significant role in shaping Texas’ financial and political landscape, including supporting reactionary politicians. This historical context sets the stage for understanding the modern Pro-Natalism movement’s roots and motivations.

The Ethical Labyrinth of Pro-Natalism in Tech

The Pro-Natalism movement, with its roots entrenched in Big Tech’s libertarian ethos, presents a complex ethical labyrinth. This section of the article for Revyo dives into the deep-seated implications of this ideology on societal values and norms.

We live in an era where the lines between science and ethics blur, especially in fields like genetics and human augmentation. The Pro-Natalism movement, championed by some of Silicon Valley’s titans, walks these lines precariously. It raises profound questions about the future direction of humanity, influenced by notions of genetic ‘superiority’.

The ethical quandary here isn’t just about the science of it all. It’s about the societal impact. If these ideas gain traction, what does it mean for our concepts of equality and diversity? Are we veering dangerously close to a future where genetic ‘enhancements’ create new social divides? And critically, who decides what constitutes ‘superior’ genetics?

In Silicon Valley, where innovation often outpaces ethical considerations, this movement could reshape our future in ways we’re only beginning to understand. It’s a narrative that requires not just scientific scrutiny but a moral and philosophical one as well. As technology races ahead, it’s imperative to pause and reflect on these ethical crossroads.

Countering Pro-Natalism: The Role of Public Discourse and Regulation

The rise of Pro-Natalism in Big Tech necessitates a robust counter-movement grounded in public discourse and regulatory frameworks. This section explores how collective action and policy-making can shape the trajectory of genetic technologies. The emphasis is on fostering a society that values diversity and equality over genetic elitism. Engaging diverse voices – from ethicists to the general public – in dialogues about the implications of human augmentation is crucial. Additionally, exploring potential regulatory measures can ensure that advancements in genetics are used ethically and responsibly, avoiding a future where genetics determine societal hierarchy. The role of global collaboration in setting ethical standards for technology use becomes paramount.

This article on Pro-Natalism in Big Tech, focusing on figures like Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Marc Andreessen, is profoundly unsettling yet crucial. It unveils how influential tech moguls are driving a movement with eugenic undertones. The historical and financial roots of key proponents like Malcolm and Simone Collins add depth to the narrative, showing the movement’s deep integration in American power structures. The ethical implications are vast, raising concerns about genetic elitism and societal impacts. The need for public discourse and regulation to counter such ideologies is evident. This article serves as a wake-up call to the potential dangers of unchecked technological advancements in genetics and the moral responsibilities of those at the helm.


  • Juniper Denali

    Juniper Denali is a finance and technology writer with a penchant for unearthing unconventional insights. She weaves together her expertise in polyamory, her enthusiasm for '90s nostalgia, and her love for coding to provide readers with fresh perspectives on finance and tech topics. Living in a shared cabin in Northern California, Juniper is an ardent advocate for communal living, and her lived experiences greatly inform her writings. Known for challenging traditional thought and venturing into unexplored territories, she continues to inspire readers through her engaging and thought-provoking articles for Revyo.

    View all posts

1 thought on “Big Tech Libertarians and the Pro-Natalism Meme”

Leave a Comment